NEWS: Thiopropazate Omeprazole Minocin Zolpidem! Chlorotrianisene Gentamicin Mirtazapine Cordarone Adenosine Bleomycin Acetazolamide Methimazole. Tolbutamide Trazodone, Cyproheptadine Nialamide: Isoniazid Inderal! Mazindol Iodamide Stavudine Methenamine Famvir Estradiol Acyclovir Suboxone Flonase Bupropion, Piperacetazine Echinacea? Percocet Hexamethonium Buspar Trichlormethiazide? Heroin Rizatriptan Amiodarone Keflex Penicillin Chlorotrianisene Loracarbef Trimethobenzamide Clomid Naloxone Advair Neomycin Clemastine Piperazine Nadolol Amaryl Zantac Cilexetil Alesse Nitroprusside! Dextrothyroxine Mephobarbital! Mepenzolate Toprol Methoxsalen Norethindrone? Lunesta Trovafloxacin Isocarboxazid Cyclizine Chlortetracycline Zyrtec! Lisinopril Lozol! Bromocriptine Methotrexate Thiabendazole Cinoxacin Ceftizoxime Phenergan Xanax Nalbuphine Ribavirin Doxepin Carphenazine Carbidopa! Skelaxin Oxymorphone! Ethionamide Concerta Provigil Ganciclovir Ethinyl Oleandomycin. Phytonadione Trihexyphenidyl Aminopterin Remeron Benzthiazide Propranolol. Tetracycline Flagyl Phenylpropanolamine Dextroamphetamine Ergotamine Climara Homatropine Gemfibrozil Methsuximide Dyphylline Aprotinin Methadone. Valerian Lotrel: Atarax Dulcolax! Trientine Terfenadine! Danazol Bumetanide Vicodin Moxifloxacin Demeclocycline Fosamax Podofilox Ketoprofen Avapro Dicyclomine! Zyrtec Clomocycline Sulindac Benztropine Brompheniramine Doxylamine Cefoperazone Lactulose? Maprotiline Iproniazid Cyclothiazide Norfloxacin Spectinomycin Isoproterenol Avodart Leflunomide! Plicamycin Dienestrol: Haldol Lorazepam Anisotropine Ritodrine: Robaxin Kaopectate Inderal Montelukast Carbimazole Nizoral Methoxamine Ambenonium Eulexin Buprenorphine Propylthiouracil Quinine Vitamin Niacinamide Iodine Anafranil Protonix Isotretinoin: Fexofenadine Epinephrine Diclofenac Nolvadex Chlordiazepoxide Oxytetracycline? Bendroflumethiazide Androgel Cephradine Bentyl Clarinex Actonel Ergocalciferol Yasmin Chlorprothixene Diphenadione: Cyclophosphamide Vaccine. Disulfiram Metolazone Cefmetazole Avapro! Methaqualone Vicodin? Cilostazol Vytorin Amrinone Heroin: Troglitazone Nicoumalone Decamethonium Calcitriol Dicumarol Leuprolide Methantheline Buspirone Acetylcholine Atacand Daunorubicin Cycloserine Pyridium Amitriptyline Mephenytoin Dianabol? Diflunisal Tinzaparin Clomiphene Isradipine Loperamide Accupril Clopidogrel Dimethindene Digoxin Phenazopyridine, Venlafaxine Zalcitabine! Sparfloxacin Risperdal Divalproex Penicillamine Butorphanol Phentolamine, Claritin Colestipol Ceforanide Cefixime. Hydrocodone Midazolam. Zyprexa Stavudine Glimepiride Brompheniramine: Dalteparin Diltiazem. Benicar Troglitazone, Oxytetracycline Repaglinide Diphenoxylate Orlistat Echinacea Penicillin. Tolmetin Timolol? Furosemide Dipyridamole Adipex Duragesic, Ursodiol Mannitol, Methazolamide Fenfluramine Menadione Aldara! Macrodantin Avodart Levaquin Dolasetron Lescol Secobarbital! Mitoxantrone Cinnarizine Beconase Erythrityl Septra Flomax Clonidine Nabumetone Oxaprozin Glipizide Dulcolax Hyperalimentation Geodon Cytomel Ceftin Hydrocortisone Dipyridamole Estrone: Glatiramer Colchicine Anagrelide Mebanazine. Famciclovir Dexfenfluramine! Pemoline Lopressor Cyclandelate Cyclothiazide Methyclothiazide Hydrochlorothiazide, Isosorbide Accutane? Cloxacillin Topamax? Lidocaine Levlen? Ranitidine Carbenicillin Fenoterol Cefonicid, Ketorolac Dibenzepin? Bromides Losec Naloxone Dobutamine Isosorbide Cilostazol! Repaglinide Elocon Dopamine Chlorthalidone Locoid Clozapine, Trichlormethiazide Dilantin Cephalothin Camphor: Heparin Terconazole Enalapril Imipramine Norflex Captopril Arthrotec Verapamil Ondansetron Pentasa, Chloroquine Felodipine Quinapril Pseudoephedrine? Methylphenidate Cafergot Zidovudine Diprolene Procainamide Hydromorphone Nafcillin Tolmetin Potassium Chlorzoxazone Mirena Cefepime Methacycline Pyrilamine Acarbose Laetrile Thalidomide Lithium! Phenolphthalein Kaolin: Metoclopramide Fastin Iprindole Methscopolamine Isradipine Glatiramer? Cefuroxime Famotidine! Thyrotropin Ethionamide Aztreonam Methyldopa: Zafirlukast Dioxyline Nicardipine Perphenazine Glycerin Pancuronium: Bontril Piperidolate! Guaifenesin Fioricet! Melphalan Chlortetracycline Mirapex Zyprexa: Meprobamate Bepridil Phenoxybenzamine Ribavirin? Chlorpropamide Cephalexin Ionamin Benadryl Hydrocortisone Nylidrin Protirelin Betamethasone Hydroflumethiazide Disulfiram. Flovent Amoxicillin! Pancuronium Pentazocine Colchicine Clonidine Phencyclidine Amiodarone? Droperidol Cefuroxime Ultracet Mesalamine Elidel Lanoxin Dicyclomine Cleocin Hyzaar Terazosin: Triamcinolone Meclizine Adapalene Troleandomycin Trifluoperazine Sucralfate Cefixime Danazol Neomycin Atracurium Oxtriphylline Carphenazine Chlorambucil Chantix Bacampicillin Levaquin! Hexamethonium Loprox Triflupromazine Esmolol Betaxolol Amiloride Viagra Methacycline Thyroid Phenyltoloxamine, Terfenadine Amoxapine Arava Ursodiol Sertraline Celecoxib Cefprozil Fenoterol Mefloquine Macrobid Thiothixene Insulin Dimethothiazine Foscarnet Tricor Ergocalciferol? Aldactone Oxyphenonium Midazolam Eprosartan Bexarotene Chloramphenicol Sumatriptan Marijuana Lodine Minocin! Elocon Naprosyn Carbidopa Cefdinir. Somatostatin Cyclobenzaprine Zuclopenthixol Cefoperazone: Nicoumalone Octreotide Indocin Paregoric Guanfacine Oxycodone? Lamivudine Thiabendazole Fluvoxamine Doxycycline Nuvaring Oxprenolol Naltrexone Gitalin Differin Pentoxifylline? Guanethidine Letrozole? Amiloride Nadroparin. Aspirin Calan Antazoline Cimetidine Afrin Voltaren Felbamate Labetalol Probenecid Meclofenamate Effexor Bricanyl! Ethinamate Oxtriphylline Procyclidine Ethynodiol, Bretylium Methotrimeprazine Chantix Daunorubicin Phenylephrine Femara Medrol Provera! Tolazamide Imdur Griseofulvin Aspirin Cosopt Prednisone? Foradil Biperiden Busulfan Tridihexethyl Minocycline Tocainide! Phenyltoloxamine Micronase Atacand Thiothixene! Phenazocine Clonazepam Simvastatin Zidovudine? Chlorothiazide Sulindac! Trimethaphan Phenelzine Cocaine Avalide, Norethindrone Beconase Rabeprazole Propofol Astemizole Cefotaxime, Reglan Alavert Olanzapine Ethambutol Soma Cortisone Toprol Methylphenidate Ticarcillin Chlorothiazide Trandolapril Isopropamide, Meloxicam Crestor Ketamine Metronidazole Minoxidil Amrinone? Methenamine Pyrazinamide Premarin Epirubicin Electricity Beclomethasone! Fluticasone Thyrotropin? Acetohexamide Novobiocin Tyropanoate Dirithromycin! Mucomyst Furazolidone Carisoprodol Imipenem. Alprazolam Thiopropazate: Plendil Hexachlorophene! Insulin Vancomycin! Ethanol Losartan. Diphemanil Somatostatin Dioxyline Ultram Eldepryl Avandia Carbachol Alteplase Zileuton Codeine Imipenem Hexoprenaline Niacinamide Divalproex? Feldene Gabapentin Quinacrine Phenprocoumon Meperidine Levitra. Ramipril Indomethacin? Estrone Parnaparin Fastin Minocycline.

DOE and Contractors now expected to share Medicare Part D Supplement

May 8th, 2008 -Posted by admin

It is expected that the Tennessee Congressional Delegation, the DOE, and the contractors will announce in the next week or so that the Medicare Part D supplement will be shared with the contractor retirees. In other words, it is expected that on the order of one-half of the supplement will go to the company to pay for its part of medical costs and one- half will go to pay for retiree costs. Although exact figures are not available, the monthly payment of a retiree should be reduced significantly. This will be a reversal of DOE policy that will have been attained by the diligence of Senator Alexander and his staff and the Tennessee congressional delegation.

This would be a victory for retirees as CORRE leaders have maintained and insisted all along that one half of any supplement should go to retirees, thus maintaining the historic 50-50 split of medical costs. CORRE leadership has long felt that this was the intent of Congress when Part D was enacted by Congress and has been tenacious in following up on this issue. Senator Alexander and the Tennessee Delegation in Congress have worked diligently on behalf of Oak Ridge contractor retirees to change the DOE policies and to bring this benefit. It is expected that the contractors will extend this 50-50 sharing benefit to their retirees.

Now, from the perspective of the retirees, the Tennessee delegation needs to renew its efforts for attaining equitable adjustments and the spousal option for retirees. CORRE sees no let up in the pressure for DOE to right the wrongs and end the discriminatory actions against Tennesseans that have been practiced for so many years by DOE. Again, CORRE is looking to the leadership of Senator Alexander and the Tennessee delegation to get that job done.

Pete Lotts
Chair
Government Relations Committee
CORRE

A Must Read

April 29th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

 Bob Henderson and Alfred Brooks write:

 

Dub Shults, a 1994 retiree, has published a thoughtful guest column in Sunday's News Sentinel (4/20/08) which is worth reading: http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/apr/20/oak-ridge-retirees-deserve-ra ise/ and publicizing further. Bob and I suggest that you send the above link to friends, editors of other newspapers including weeklies, and to your local legislators asking for their proactive support on this matter. Letters to the N-S would also be in order. We need what Bob has called a blitz.

 

State Resolution

April 26th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Alfred Brooks suggested I post this for your information.

  The HJR 1006 resolution urging the TN Legislature and others to support the CORRE pension plans can be found at : http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/bills/currentga/BILL/HJR1006.pdf

Oak Ridge retirees deserve raise- article in the Knoxville News Sentinel

April 20th, 2008 -Posted by admin

Dub Shults has an article in today' s Knoxville News Sentinel on the lack of pension adjustments for Oak Ridge retirees.  Dub gets to the point:
"Here is a headline that I would like to see somewhere, sometime: "DOE contractor retirees win pension adjustment." Reminds me of the Peyton Manning TV commercial where he says, "It ain't gonna happen."

The fact is, DOE and its contractor organizations continue to delay and deny requests by local retirees for a pension adjustment, even though one is needed, deserved, reasonable, just and affordable and would require no new appropriation of federal money."

Read Dub's article on the KNS website.

If retirees can’t swim, DOE lets them drown

April 19th, 2008 -Posted by admin

That is the message of a letter from Harold F. Cornett to the Oak Ridger on April 17, 2008. Here is an excerpt from his letter: "DOE has been a thorn in the side of the plant workers since the early years of Oak Ridge. They have yet to honor or respect those of us who built and operated the plants through the productive times. Now that we are retired and inadequately compensated, their attitude is if they can't swim then let them drown and good riddance."

B&W Retiree Newsletter No More

April 2nd, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Monday, I told you that B&W was dropping the Newsletter we have enjoyed for years. I suggested it was probably a cost cutting action. Below is an exerpt from Frank Munger's blog. As you can see, the move was indeed about saving money - $16,000. I think the B&W budget is only about $900,000,000. So clearly, the $16,000 is crucial to the success of the B&W mission at Y-12.  

-The Editor

ps: Thanks for helping Frank!

Bill Wilburn, a B&W spokesman, said the move was about saving money and was not a negative action against CORRE.

"The retiree newsletter was discontinued as a cost-saving measure and because it was providing information that was often redundant to information sent to retirees by the B&W Y-12 Human Capital organization," Wilburn said in a statement by e-mail

He said the cost saving was more than $16,000 per year.

"Additionally, when the retiree newsletter was started, the retiree group CORRE did not have its own Web site through which it could provide information to its members," Wilburn said.

Representative Lincoln Davis Speaks of CORRE

April 1st, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Bob Henderson provides below a detailed memo regarding Representative Davis' recent visit to Harriman. -The Editor

 

On Wednesday, March 26th, Congressman Lincoln Davis, Representative of the 4th District held a "Town Hall" meeting in Harriman to hear from his constituents in Roane County.

There was a very large turnout at the Utopia Cafe. I'd estimate there were more than 150 persons in attendance to talk about a variety of concerns. Tom Lemons, a CORRE board member, was there as was former CORRE board member Bill Wilcox. There were a number of other Oak Ridge retirees in attendance, but I didn't recognize any of them.

The first comment made, after some brief intro comments by Rep. Davis was by Frank Williams, Jr. of Kingston who said he had retired in 1984 after 37 years of service at the X-10 site. He mentioned that he had been married 62 years. Frank asked Rep. Davis to help get something done about the pensions for OR retirees. He said the increasing costs of medicine,food and gas, in particular, was really making those on pensions suffer. Frank mentioned that he was a member of CORRE. In response to Williams' remarks, Hal Butler of Kingston told Rep. Davis that he (Butler) had written a letter to the editor of the Roane County News that was published in the Wednesday, March 26th edition of the paper about CORRE: Pension hike long overdue.

I got a chance to speak and I mentioned that I was a member of CORRE and that we were concerned about our pensions. I pointed out that there were over 1700 Roane County recipients of pensions and that the requested adjustments would add significantly to the Roane County tax base, the same as many new jobs would do. (Rep. Davis had mentioned prior to his visit that new jobs for the area were one of his primary goals.) I gave him a copy of the CORRE  DVD and gave him written information that had been provided me by Joe Setaro about the financial impact of the requested adjustments for Roane County.

 

I met Davis' communications coordinator Tom Hayden and also Paul Scarbrough of Rockwood who is Davis' Field Representative in Roane County. Also present were John Boughtin who is in Davis' Washington office and Sammy (or Sonny) Loudermilk who is Davis' District Director out of the McMinnville office.

 

Rep. Davis said he is very much aware of CORRE's concerns and he has been doing all he can to help us. I mentioned that we would like to see some mention of this problem and his actions toward helping solve it on his Web site. He said they would put something there, letting us know what he has been doing in this regard.

 

I said that the DOE contractor retirees in New Mexico and California and other states had better pensions that did those of us in Tennessee. I said one big reason, I felt, was that the

elected officials in those states had taken a stronger and more active role in supporting their constituents with the DOE. Davis said that the situation in California was different because the University of California had those contracts and they had a very good pension system. He also said that in Oak Ridge, there were private companies that were controlling the pension funds and that it was difficult to get them to act. After the meeting concluded Tom Lemons and I waited and talked some more with Rep. Davis. I pointed out that the pension funds were administered by one of the contractors, but that the funds were for a specific purpose and couldn't be used for any other items. Also, I pointed out that Union Carbide had modeled our pension program after the one that parent company had. While they did not have automatic COLAs, they did make periodic adjustments after any periods of significant inflation. I mentioned that Lockheed-Martin, when they took over the contract in 1984, had not followed the practice of  adjustments to offset inflation. I also pointed out that no contributions had been made to the pension fund since 1984, yet the contractors and DOE said there wasn't sufficient funds in the pension pot to allow for any adjustments to the retiree pensions.

 

I also mentioned that Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico, had said that he wouldn't vote to approve the, then newly nominated, Secretary of Energy unless he could assure Domenici that the retiree benefits for his state would not be reduced.  Representative Davis said that that was certainly a good approach for us to pursue with our Senators, since only the senators get to vote on the candidates for positions such as Secretary of Energy.

 

I told him that in South Carolina, at Savannah River, the elected officials from both the Democratic and Republican parties had banned together to present a united front in support of those constituents. Rep. Davis assured us that they do the same in Tennessee and that we needed to make sure that Alexander and Corker were on board with the requests of CORRE. He assured us that no one had worked harder on the behalf of the Oak Ridge workers and retirees than had Lincoln Davis, and that he would continue to work on our behalf.  

 

 He mentioned something about Governor Bredesen and I said that he could help us there also, since Bredesen is the Chairman of the Board for the University of Tennessee and that UT-Battelle is the managing contractor for ORNL. He said, yes, BUT, the contract is with Battelle, not with the University of TN. I said that I'd bet if Governor Bredesen said to Battelle that his Tennessee constituents who are DOE contractor retirees were being treated unfairly compared to those retirees in other states and that he wanted that to change that UT-Battelle could find a way to make the changes requested by CORRE.

He didn't comment on that statement.

 

I think CORRE members need to continue to bring this issue to Rep. Davis' attention and continue to ask him to work with our other elected officials to help bring about a positive result for all our retirees.

 

( Note: I just read the Roane County News article about the Rep. Davis meeting and much to my disappointment and chagrin, the author (Cindy Simpson) didn't report a single word about any mention of CORRE or our pension concerns by Frank Williams, Jr., Hal Butler, or myself.)

 

No More Retirement News

March 31st, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

I have been told that B&W Technical Services (formerly known as BWXT) will no longer publish and distribute the Retirement News. I suspect it may be a cost saving action; I'm reluctant to think it because they just don't want to worry about retirees.

CORRE does have other means of communicating. Those means include an electronic newsletter, a newsletter mailing, its website, and this blog. 

Possible Impediment to Pension Improvements

March 28th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

I've had a couple of comments regarding Frank Munger's blog articles (which you can easily accrss by scrolling down the right side of this page).

This past Tuesday, Frank published a chart of new hires at Y-12. A couple of weeks ago, he published the same type chart for new hires at ORNL. A CORRE member noted that ORNL has hired over 2000 new employees since 2001 and Y-12 has hired over 2500 new employees since the year 2000. Perhaps not all these are full-time and perhaps not all are eligible for a pension (though I don't know why they wouldn't). But one could reasonably assume that well more than half, say 2500 to 3000, have come to work expecting to have a pension when they retire.

Is it possible that DOE and its contractors realize that without the pension fund surplus they would need to immediately begin contributing to the pension fund to account for these new employees? Or is it possible they are thinking the pension fund surplus will take care of these people as long as they don't use part of the surplus to improve the pensions of current retirees.

What do you think? 

Nominations for CORRE Board

March 23rd, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Nominations for CORRE Board members will open April 1 and close June 1. Lou Dunlap chairs the nominating committee. You can send your nominations to Lou by E-mail (loudunlap1@comcast.net) or call her (483-9361).

Be sure the person you nominate will serve if elected.

Board members will be elected at the annual meeting which will be held in the early fall.

Congressman Davis Will Be Near

March 19th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Congressman Lincoln Davis will be at the Utopia Cafe in Kingston next Wednesday, the 26th, at 3:00. He will stay until about 4:30

Stop by and let him know of your concerns about the retirees' plight.

First Edition of CORRE News

March 12th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

I hope you got a copy of the first mailing of the CORRE newsletter. It contains much information that will be of interest to you.

Send me a note and let us know what you think about it, or what else needs to be included.

If you have not gotten a copy, you can let me know at this blog or you can mail a note to

CORRE

PO Box 4266

Oak Ridge, TN 37831-4266

Mayors Support Retirees

March 4th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

The mayors of Oak Ridge and Roane and Anderson Counties sent a letter to U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, asking for his help in getting better benefits for CORRE retirees.

Oak Ridge mayor Tom Beehan; Rex Lynch, Anderson County mayor; and Mike Farmer, mayor of Roane County jointly wrote and signed the letter.

In part it said:

"Contractor employees in Oak ridge have had for many years an inferior retirement plan when compared to others within the Department of Energy complex. It is our understanding that many retirees have now lost over 50 percent of the value of their pension benefits and are seeking an equitable adjustment. In particular, the retirees are requesting: (a) pension adjustments for all retirees that restore 75 percent of buying power lost due to inflation, (b) the same 2 percent flat-rate spousal option offered to employees retiring after June 2004 and (c) that the DOE contractors regularly review and adjust pension values for all retirees in the future in order to prevent a recurrence of the present situation. These are fair and reasonable requests that could be funded by the assets of the Pension Trust Fund.

"Our concern is for the welfare of the nearly 12,000 retirees from DOE contractors living in East Tennessee, particularly the 5,350 constituents who reside in the two counties of Anderson and Roane."

ORNL Retirees

February 22nd, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Frank Munger's blog, which you can access from this blog, has an interesting table showing the number of living ORNL retirees - by the year in which they retired. The title is More retiree numbers.

The total today is 3072.

Just thought some of you might be interested.

The Editor

Alexander & Wamp Are Trying to Help

February 14th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Keith Kibbe writes: 

Retirees have for a number of years enjoyed the support of Congressman Wamp.  In fact, Congressman Wamp has stated recently that he anticipates that his seniority and influence will increase in the House of Representatives for the next Congress and that he intends to openly confront DOE about the need  for pension adjustments  for Oak Ridge retirees.   Fortunately, over the last year CORRE has succeeded in also obtaining the support of Senator Alexander.   In various of his Town Hall meetings last October, Senator Alexander openly stated that he is on our side but he also pointed out that it is a difficult problem to solve because people on the other side of the issue tell him that they do not agree with CORRE "on the numbers".   They claim the pension adjustments would weaken the retirement fund.  CORRE knows this is not the case.    Senator Alexander and his staff are currently taking a close look into the situation, seeking ways to make the adjustments happen.   CORRE, for its part, is assisting by clarifying and simplifying the math associated with the adjustments being sought.  CORRE is providing the Senator, and the local Contractor officials, a simplified table that will show the % pension increase CORRE is seeking for each year of retirement.  The longer a person has been retired, the more the inflation losses have been and therefor the larger the pension increase would be.    These % increases correspond to CORRE's long standing request that  each retiree receiving a pension increase that would recover about 75% of inflationary looses since the year of retirement.   The CORRE Board knows that this table will permit a straightforward calculation to be made which will show that the retirement fund can "afford" the requested pension adjustments.   Progress is slowly being made by CORRE on pension adjustments, but it is a difficult process.  If it were easy it would have been accomplished long ago.


What grade would UT-Battelle receive on treatment of retirees?

February 12th, 2008 -Posted by admin

DOE has given UT-Battelle straight A's on it performance as manager of ORNL.  See Frank Munger's article on the DOE evaluation.  As retirees, we are all, of course, appreciative of the job they have done to keep ORNL a top notch lab.  However, on some things, the management of UT-Battelle does not have such stellar performance.  They do not measure up to what Union Carbide did to keep retirees protected to some degree from inflation.

What score would you give them on looking out for retirees?

‘Delay, deny and hope they die’

February 12th, 2008 -Posted by admin

In a post on Frank Munger's blog, Robert Henderson, an Oak Ridge contractor retiree, said he believes that DOE's strategy regarding a pension increase is to delay, deny, and hope they die. Indeed! Read the whole thing and the comments on Munger's Atomic City Underground.

Here is the link to the post.

Wamp Vows to Help

February 8th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Judy Kidd provided the following note. 

I was reading this morning's paper, and I came across this little
aside in Frank Munger's column. He is writing about Zach Wamp's
increasing influence in Congress and about his work on the energy and 
water subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee. What 
caught my eye was this final paragraph:
 
"Side Note: Wamp made it clear that, if he becomes the energy and 
water subcommittee's Republican leader, he plans to exert direct 
pressure on the energy secretary to free up a pension increase for 
Oak Ridge retirees."

Backdoor COLA Cuts

January 31st, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason
Al Brooks brought this to my attention and I thought you would be interested-Dave
How Congress Let Economists Do The Dirty Work in 1998
By Mary Johnson

 

 

What could you do with an extra $778 this year? Pay your Part D plan premiums or your rent for a month? Buy groceries? I can think of a hundred ways to use it! That’s why I was shocked when I estimated that someone who retired with an average benefit of $816 per month in 2000 would have received an extra $778 in higher Social Security benefits this year if government economists hadn’t quietly changed the way they calculate the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in 1998.


Your annual Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA) is calculated by the rate of increase in the CPI. Changing the math to make the CPI seem to be growing more slowly also cut the growth of your Social Security benefit, especially over time.

In 1996, a report by a commission of economists recommended a 1% downward adjustment to the CPI. Some economists, including Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, said the index “overstated” inflation and that seniors were being overpaid.

The proposal was rightfully considered to be political dynamite. Instead of legislating any changes to COLAs, a wary Congress seized on the strategy of letting the government economists at the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) do their dirty work for them. The BLS, the agency responsible for collecting the data and calculating the CPI, adopted a series of seemingly tiny changes that makes the index grow more slowly.

In 1998 The Senior Citizens League created national controversy when it warned seniors that changes the government was making to the CPI would result in cutting the COLA. Senior outrage prompted the commissioner of Social Security to hold an emergency press conference seeking to assure seniors that they would continue to receive a COLA, although the increases would be smaller in the future.

By 2000 government economists estimated that the BLS changes had resulted in slowing the growth of the CPI by an estimated 0.8 percentage point annually. The following table illustrates the impact on an average benefit of $816 of such a reduction.

 

 

Impact of 0.8 Percentage Point Change In CPI On Your Social Security Benefit

Year

Monthly Benefit

(If Pre-1998 CPI Used)

Actual Monthly

Benefit

COLA*

(If Pre-1998 CPI

Used)

Actual COLA*

Annual Benefit

(If Pre-1998 CPI Used)

Actual Annual Benefit

2000 $816.00 $816.00 4.3% 3.5% $9,792.00 $9,792.00
2001 $851.09 $844.56 3.4% 2.6% $10,213.06 $10,134.72
2002 $880.02 $866.52 2.2% 1.4% $10,560.30 $10,398.22
2003 $899.39 $878.65 2.9% 2.1% $10,792.63 $10,543.80
2004 $925.47 $897.10 3.5% 2.7% $11,105.61 $10,765.22
2005 $957.86 $921.32 4.9% 4.1% $11,494.31 $11,055.88
2006 $1,004.79 $959.10 4.1% 3.3% $12,057.53 $11,509.17
2007 $1045.99 $990.75 3.1% 2.3% $12,551.89 $11,888.97
2008 $1,078.42 $1,013.53 $12,941.00 $12,162.42

Total

$101,508.32

$98,250.40

* COLAs payable starting January 1 in the following year.

In the past 13 years, since I’ve been writing this newsletter, changing the CPI, cutting COLAs, or both, have been proposed as major options for Congress to cut spending on Social Security virtually every year. The Senior Citizens League fights such cuts and instead supports legislation that would pay a more fair and adequate COLA using a seniors CPI, The Consumer Price Index For Elderly Consumers (CPI-E). TSCL supports two similar bills “The Consumer Price Index for Elderly Consumers,” H.R. 1953 introduced by Representative Charles Gonzalez (TX)), and H.R. 2032 introduced by Representative Peter DeFazio (OR).

Real Life Situation in Oak Ridge

January 14th, 2008 -Posted by Dave Mason

Bob Henderson writes:

"Joe" had attended evening school and worked as an accountant. He was recruited in 1942 to come do important work "for the government" in Oak Ridge. With pride he served his country supporting the secret work here. His family moved to Knoxville until rental housing became available in Oak Ridge in 1945. When Oak Ridgers were allowed to buy their government-owned-houses in 1957 he bought the home they had rented for twelve years. By 1971-72 health problems forced him to retire shortly before he was sixty-five.

Joe was a professional who worked in Oak Ridge for 30 years. Salaries weren't very high in Oak Ridge when he retired in the early 70's, but he was confident his government would reward his loyalty with a livable pension for him and his wife for as long as they lived. Joe died in 1989 at age 81. His widow receives a surviving spouse pension check and she remains in the house where she has now lived for over sixty two years.

Her pension check in 2005 was $395 each month and $187 of that was withheld to provide health coverage. She received a net of $209 each month from the pension. That and her social security check are how she survives. She provides minimal upkeep on the house, keeps the lights and heat as low as she can stand and doesn't pay anyone to come to clean because she can't afford it. She fell in the Fall of 2006 and broke her hip. After time in the hospital and in rehab, she returned to her home to live alone.

As a ninety-three year old, she wouldn't complain because she grew up during the depression. She loves Oak Ridge, her USA, and the University of Tennessee. She taught school for a number of years when she was younger. Is this how we say, "Thanks for a job well done for DOE contractor retirees and their spouses in Oak Ridge?

In December of 2007, now 94 years old, she fell again at her home and couldn't reach the telephone to call for help. She lay on the floor for two days before someone came and found her. I visited her in early January, 2008 at a health care center. She hopes to be able to return home soon. One of her most pressing concerns is the high cost of care outside her home. How long will she be able to hold on hoping for a pension adjustment that can make her last days more tolerable, at least financially? Should I suggest that she be patient? Should we wait patiently for change?